Search OEDI Data
Showing results 1 - 13 of 13.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Research Areas
Accessibility
Data Type
Organization
Source
Utah FORGE: Groundwater Data
This submission includes two modeled drawdown scenarios with new supply well locations, a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration grid (raster dataset representing the spatial distribution of TDS), and an excel spreadsheet containing well data.
Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Jul 20, 2016
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Shear Induced Permeability Test: Brady and Desert Peak Core X-Ray CT Files
As part of the shear induced permeability test, the rock cores were also scanned with X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) before and after sustainability tests using a modified GE Lightspeed 16 medical CT scanner. The CT provides another perspective on the fracture and aperture, as wel...
Kneafsey, T. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sep 26, 2016
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
AASG Wells Data for the EGS Test Site Planning and Analysis Task
AASG Wells Data for the EGS Test Site Planning and Analysis Task
Temperature measurement data obtained from boreholes for the Association of American State Geologists (AASG) geothermal data project. Typically bottomhole temperatures are recorded from log headers, and this informat...
Augustine, C. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Oct 09, 2013
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 Planned Trajectory
This submission includes an Excel spreadsheet containing the Utah FORGE deep well 16A(78)-32 planned trajectory including UTM coordinates, elevations, and depths from the well head to the toe. This proposed new injection well is expected to descend vertically to a depth of approxi...
Podgorney, R. and Nash, G. Idaho National Laboratory
Mar 24, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates
Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injecti...
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 07, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Kvichak River RISEC Project Resource Reconnaissance and Physical Characterization, Igiugig, AK
During the summer and fall of 2011 TerraSond Ltd. (TerraSond) completed a bathymetric survey and hydrokinetic energy assessment of the Kvichak River at Igiugig, Alaska. The purpose of this work was to characterize the initial site conditions for the design and installation of a hy...
McEntee, J. Ocean Renewable Power Company
Oct 01, 2015
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Archuleta County CO Lineaments
This layer traces apparent topographic and air-photo lineaments in the area around Pagosa springs in Archuleta County, Colorado. It was made in order to identify possible fault and fracture systems that might be conduits for geothermal fluids.
Geothermal fluids commonly utilize fa...
E., R. Flint Geothermal, LLC
Jan 01, 2012
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
New River Geothermal Exploration (Ram Power Inc.)
The New River Geothermal Exploration (DOE Award No. EE0002843) is located approximately 25km south of the Salton Sea, near town of Brawley in Imperial County and approximately 150km east of San Diego, California.
A total of 182 MT Logger sites were completed covering the two sepa...
Mirza, R. and Data, E. Ram Power, Inc.
Nov 15, 2013
20 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
20 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Fallon FORGE: Well Data, Geophysical Data, and Geologic Maps
The data is associated to the Fallon FORGE project and includes mudlogs for all wells used to characterize the subsurface, as wells as gravity, magnetotelluric, earthquake seismicity, and temperature data from the Navy GPO and Ormat. Also included are geologic maps from the USGS a...
Blankenship, D. Sandia National Laboratories
Mar 31, 2016
54 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
54 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Appendices for Geothermal Exploration Artificial Intelligence Report
The Geothermal Exploration Artificial Intelligence looks to use machine learning to spot geothermal identifiers from land maps. This is done to remotely detect geothermal sites for the purpose of energy uses. Such uses include enhanced geothermal system (EGS) applications, especia...
Duzgun, H. et al Colorado School of Mines
Jan 08, 2021
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
12 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
EGS Collab Experiment 1: Microseismic Monitoring
The U.S. Department of Energy's Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Collab project aims to improve our understanding of hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock for enhanced geothermal energy production through execution of intensely monitored meso-scale experiments. The first expe...
Schoenball, M. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jul 29, 2019
46 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
46 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Risk Factor Analysis in Low-Temperature Geothermal Play Fairway Analysis for the Appalachian Basin (GPFA-AB)
This submission contains information used to compute the risk factors for the GPFA-AB project. The risk factors are natural reservoir quality, thermal resource quality, potential for induced seismicity, and utilization. The methods used to combine the risk factors included taking ...
E., T. Cornell University
Sep 30, 2015
191 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
191 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible