Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report
DOI
10.15121/1578287
Publicly accessible
License
This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.
AU - Moore, Joseph
A2 - Simmons, Stuart
A3 - McLennan, John
A4 - Jones, Clay
A5 - Skowron, Gosia
A6 - Wannamaker, Phil
A7 - Nash, Greg
A8 - Hardwick, Christian
A9 - Hurlbut, Will
A10 - Allis, Rick
A11 - Kirby, Stephan
A12 - Erickson, Ben
A13 - Feigl, Kurt
A14 - Batzli, Sam
A15 - Miller, John
A16 - Witter, Jeff
A17 - Podgorney, Rob
A18 - Pankow, Kristine
A19 - Reinisch, Elena
A20 - Patel, Vivek
A21 - Martin, Taylor
A22 - Rutledge, Jim
A23 - McKean, Adam
DB - Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI)
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO - 10.15121/1578287
KW - geothermal
KW - energy
KW - FORGE
KW - Utah FORGE
KW - Utah FORGE Phase 2C Report
KW - Phase 2C Topical Report
KW - Utah FORGE Phase 2C
KW - EGS
KW - moderate rate injection tests
KW - microseismic
KW - Distributed Acoustic Sensing
KW - DAS
KW - seismic reflection survey
KW - gravity measurements
KW - INSaR
KW - stimulated
KW - numerical reservoir models
KW - alluvium-granitoid
KW - Injection testing
KW - Milford
KW - Roosevelt Hot Springs
KW - overview
KW - results
KW - lessons
KW - learned
KW - conclusions
KW - permitting
KW - characterization
KW - site
KW - data inventory
KW - conceptual
KW - geologic
KW - model
KW - geophysics
KW - seismic
KW - gravity
KW - geology
KW - feasibility
KW - technical
KW - injection test
KW - microseismicity
KW - remote sensing
KW - modeling
KW - stimulation
LA - English
DA - 2019/12/11
PY - 2019
PB - Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
T1 - Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report
UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287
ER -
Moore, Joseph, et al. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, 11 December, 2019, GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287.
Moore, J., Simmons, S., McLennan, J., Jones, C., Skowron, G., Wannamaker, P., Nash, G., Hardwick, C., Hurlbut, W., Allis, R., Kirby, S., Erickson, B., Feigl, K., Batzli, S., Miller, J., Witter, J., Podgorney, R., Pankow, K., Reinisch, E., Patel, V., Martin, T., Rutledge, J., & McKean, A. (2019). Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report. [Data set]. GDR. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287
Moore, Joseph, Stuart Simmons, John McLennan, Clay Jones, Gosia Skowron, Phil Wannamaker, Greg Nash, Christian Hardwick, Will Hurlbut, Rick Allis, Stephan Kirby, Ben Erickson, Kurt Feigl, Sam Batzli, John Miller, Jeff Witter, Rob Podgorney, Kristine Pankow, Elena Reinisch, Vivek Patel, Taylor Martin, Jim Rutledge, and Adam McKean. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, December, 11, 2019. Distributed by GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287
@misc{OEDI_Dataset_7321,
title = {Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report},
author = {Moore, Joseph and Simmons, Stuart and McLennan, John and Jones, Clay and Skowron, Gosia and Wannamaker, Phil and Nash, Greg and Hardwick, Christian and Hurlbut, Will and Allis, Rick and Kirby, Stephan and Erickson, Ben and Feigl, Kurt and Batzli, Sam and Miller, John and Witter, Jeff and Podgorney, Rob and Pankow, Kristine and Reinisch, Elena and Patel, Vivek and Martin, Taylor and Rutledge, Jim and McKean, Adam},
abstractNote = {This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.},
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1187},
year = {2019},
howpublished = {GDR, Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287},
note = {Accessed: 2025-05-03},
doi = {10.15121/1578287}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1578287
Details
Data from Dec 11, 2019
Last updated Jun 8, 2020
Submitted Dec 11, 2019
Organization
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Contact
Gosia Skowron
801.585.9762
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1187Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, energy, FORGE, Utah FORGE, Utah FORGE Phase 2C Report, Phase 2C Topical Report, Utah FORGE Phase 2C, EGS, moderate rate injection tests, microseismic, Distributed Acoustic Sensing, DAS, seismic reflection survey, gravity measurements, INSaR, stimulated, numerical reservoir models, alluvium-granitoid, Injection testing, Milford, Roosevelt Hot Springs, overview, results, lessons, learned, conclusions, permitting, characterization, site, data inventory, conceptual, geologic, model, geophysics, seismic, gravity, geology, feasibility, technical, injection test, microseismicity, remote sensing, modeling, stimulationDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080
