Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018
This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.
AU - Moore, Joe
A2 - Allis, Rick
A3 - Simmons, Stuart Simmons
A4 - Nash, Greg
A5 - McLennan, John
A6 - Forbes, Bryan
A7 - Jones, Clay
A8 - Pankow, Kris
A9 - Hardwick, Christian
A10 - Gwynn, Mark
A11 - Rahilly, Kristin
A12 - Kirby, Stefan
A13 - Miller, John
A14 - Bartley, John
A15 - Knudsen, Tyler
A16 - Kleber, Emily
A17 - Hiscock, Adam
A18 - Podgorney, Robert
A19 - Skowron, Gosia
A20 - Carlson, Chris
DB - Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI)
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO - 10.15121/1530547
KW - geothermal
KW - energy
KW - FORGE
KW - Utah FORGE
KW - Roosevelt Hot Springs
KW - Utah FORGE phase 2B
KW - Utah FORGE 2B final report
KW - Utah FORGE final report
KW - Utah FORGE 2B
KW - conceptual geologic model
KW - geology
KW - structural
KW - soil gas survey
KW - seismic reflection
KW - temperature profile
KW - well 58-32
KW - geomechanical properties
KW - stress analysis
KW - seismic monitoring
KW - microseismicity
KW - induced seismicity
KW - seismicity
KW - TEM
KW - transient electromagnetics
KW - permeability
KW - petrology cuttings
KW - CO2
KW - He
KW - carbon dioxide
KW - helium
KW - ISMP
KW - induced seismicity mitigation plan
KW - environmental impact assessment
KW - techno-economic assessment
KW - outreach
KW - geophysics
KW - well
KW - petrology
KW - hydrochemistry
KW - fractures
KW - gravity
KW - permitting
KW - infrastruture
KW - seismic mitigation
KW - environmental assessment
KW - rock stress
KW - geomechanics
KW - soil gas
KW - DFN
KW - construction
KW - Quaternary faults
KW - Utah
KW - EGS
KW - Milford
LA - English
DA - 2018/04/07
PY - 2018
PB - Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
T1 - Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018
UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1530547
ER -
Moore, Joe, et al. Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, 7 April, 2018, GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1530547.
Moore, J., Allis, R., Simmons, S., Nash, G., McLennan, J., Forbes, B., Jones, C., Pankow, K., Hardwick, C., Gwynn, M., Rahilly, K., Kirby, S., Miller, J., Bartley, J., Knudsen, T., Kleber, E., Hiscock, A., Podgorney, R., Skowron, G., & Carlson, C. (2018). Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018. [Data set]. GDR. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. https://doi.org/10.15121/1530547
Moore, Joe, Rick Allis, Stuart Simmons Simmons, Greg Nash, John McLennan, Bryan Forbes, Clay Jones, Kris Pankow, Christian Hardwick, Mark Gwynn, Kristin Rahilly, Stefan Kirby, John Miller, John Bartley, Tyler Knudsen, Emily Kleber, Adam Hiscock, Robert Podgorney, Gosia Skowron, and Chris Carlson. Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, April, 7, 2018. Distributed by GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1530547
@misc{OEDI_Dataset_7193,
title = {Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018},
author = {Moore, Joe and Allis, Rick and Simmons, Stuart Simmons and Nash, Greg and McLennan, John and Forbes, Bryan and Jones, Clay and Pankow, Kris and Hardwick, Christian and Gwynn, Mark and Rahilly, Kristin and Kirby, Stefan and Miller, John and Bartley, John and Knudsen, Tyler and Kleber, Emily and Hiscock, Adam and Podgorney, Robert and Skowron, Gosia and Carlson, Chris},
abstractNote = {This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.},
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1038},
year = {2018},
howpublished = {GDR, Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah, https://doi.org/10.15121/1530547},
note = {Accessed: 2025-05-03},
doi = {10.15121/1530547}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1530547
Details
Data from Apr 7, 2018
Last updated Mar 9, 2020
Submitted Mar 21, 2018
Organization
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Contact
Greg Nash
801.585.9986
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1038Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, energy, FORGE, Utah FORGE, Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah FORGE phase 2B, Utah FORGE 2B final report, Utah FORGE final report, Utah FORGE 2B, conceptual geologic model, geology, structural, soil gas survey, seismic reflection, temperature profile, well 58-32, geomechanical properties, stress analysis, seismic monitoring, microseismicity, induced seismicity, seismicity, TEM, transient electromagnetics, permeability, petrology cuttings, CO2, He, carbon dioxide, helium, ISMP, induced seismicity mitigation plan, environmental impact assessment, techno-economic assessment, outreach, geophysics, well, petrology, hydrochemistry, fractures, gravity, permitting, infrastruture, seismic mitigation, environmental assessment, rock stress, geomechanics, soil gas, DFN, construction, Quaternary faults, Utah, EGS, MilfordDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080