Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios
The information given in this file pertains to Argonne life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of the plant cycle stage for a set of ten new geothermal scenario pairs, each comprised of a reference and improved case. These analyses were conducted to compare environmental performances among the scenarios and cases. The types of plants evaluated are hydrothermal binary and flash and Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) binary and flash plants. Each scenario pair was developed by the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) group using the Geothermal Electricity Evaluation Model (GETEM) as a way to identify plant operational and resource combinations that could reduce geothermal power plant LCOE values. Based on the specified plant and well field characteristics (plant type, capacity, capacity factor and lifetime, and well numbers and depths) for each case of each pair, Argonne generated a corresponding set of material to power ratios (MPRs) and greenhouse gas and fossil energy ratios.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - The information given in this file pertains to Argonne life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of the plant cycle stage for a set of ten new geothermal scenario pairs, each comprised of a reference and improved case. These analyses were conducted to compare environmental performances among the scenarios and cases. The types of plants evaluated are hydrothermal binary and flash and Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) binary and flash plants. Each scenario pair was developed by the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) group using the Geothermal Electricity Evaluation Model (GETEM) as a way to identify plant operational and resource combinations that could reduce geothermal power plant LCOE values. Based on the specified plant and well field characteristics (plant type, capacity, capacity factor and lifetime, and well numbers and depths) for each case of each pair, Argonne generated a corresponding set of material to power ratios (MPRs) and greenhouse gas and fossil energy ratios.
AU - Sullivan, John
DB - Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI)
DP - Open EI | National Renewable Energy Laboratory
DO - 10.15121/1148726
KW - geothermal
KW - alternative scenarios
KW - life cycle metrics
KW - greenhouse gas ratios
KW - LCOEs
KW - LCA
KW - GHG ratio
KW - energy ratio
KW - material to power ratios
KW - life-cycle analyses
KW - cost of energy
KW - levelized
KW - material to power ratio
KW - MPR
KW - GETEM
KW - evaluatiion
KW - resource
KW - inventory
KW - hydrothermal
KW - economic
KW - evaluation
KW - cost
KW - energy
KW - ratio
KW - GHG
KW - fossil fuel
KW - power
KW - production
KW - scenarios
LA - English
DA - 2014/03/14
PY - 2014
PB - Argonne National Laboratory
T1 - Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios
UR - https://doi.org/10.15121/1148726
ER -
Sullivan, John. Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios. Argonne National Laboratory, 14 March, 2014, GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148726.
Sullivan, J. (2014). Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios. [Data set]. GDR. Argonne National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148726
Sullivan, John. Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios. Argonne National Laboratory, March, 14, 2014. Distributed by GDR. https://doi.org/10.15121/1148726
@misc{OEDI_Dataset_6688,
title = {Alternative Geothermal Power Production Scenarios},
author = {Sullivan, John},
abstractNote = {The information given in this file pertains to Argonne life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of the plant cycle stage for a set of ten new geothermal scenario pairs, each comprised of a reference and improved case. These analyses were conducted to compare environmental performances among the scenarios and cases. The types of plants evaluated are hydrothermal binary and flash and Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) binary and flash plants. Each scenario pair was developed by the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) group using the Geothermal Electricity Evaluation Model (GETEM) as a way to identify plant operational and resource combinations that could reduce geothermal power plant LCOE values. Based on the specified plant and well field characteristics (plant type, capacity, capacity factor and lifetime, and well numbers and depths) for each case of each pair, Argonne generated a corresponding set of material to power ratios (MPRs) and greenhouse gas and fossil energy ratios. },
url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/350},
year = {2014},
howpublished = {GDR, Argonne National Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.15121/1148726},
note = {Accessed: 2025-04-29},
doi = {10.15121/1148726}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1148726
Details
Data from Mar 14, 2014
Last updated Oct 17, 2019
Submitted Mar 14, 2014
Organization
Argonne National Laboratory
Contact
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/350Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, alternative scenarios, life cycle metrics, greenhouse gas ratios, LCOEs, LCA, GHG ratio, energy ratio, material to power ratios, life-cycle analyses, cost of energy, levelized, material to power ratio, MPR, GETEM, evaluatiion, resource, inventory, hydrothermal, economic, evaluation, cost, energy, ratio, GHG, fossil fuel, power, production, scenariosDOE Project Details
Project Lead Arlene Anderson
Project Number FY13 AOP 1
