Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report
This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and planned activities. Phase 3B Year 1 site activities focused on the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, seismic monitoring, and data analysis. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE remains to demonstrate the viability of Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) energy development.
Citation Formats
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah. (2023). Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report [data set]. Retrieved from https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart. Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report. United States: N.p., 09 Aug, 2023. Web. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, & Simmons, Stuart. Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report. United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523
Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart. 2023. "Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report". United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523.
@div{oedi_5962, title = {Utah FORGE: 2023 Phase 3B Year 1 Annual Report}, author = {Moore, Joe, Wannamaker, Phillip, McLennen, John, Pankow, Kris, Skowron, Gosia, Nash, Greg, Jones, Clay, Barker, Ben, Podgorney, Rob, and Simmons, Stuart.}, abstractNote = {This report discusses the objectives, goals, accomplishments and results of Phase 3B Year 1 of the Utah FORGE project. The report includes infrastructure, seismic monitoring, modelling, external R&D, communications and outreach, data produced, lessons learned, conclusions, and planned activities. Phase 3B Year 1 site activities focused on the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, seismic monitoring, and data analysis. The ultimate objective of Utah FORGE remains to demonstrate the viability of Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) energy development.}, doi = {}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2023}, month = {08}}
Details
Data from Aug 9, 2023
Last updated Sep 1, 2023
Submitted Aug 9, 2023
Organization
Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Contact
Joe Moore
801.585.6931
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1523Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, energy, Utah FORGE, seismic monitoring, infrastructure, modelling, RD, communications, outreach, annual report, plans, data, MT, magnetotelluric, Phase 3B, Milford, EGS, stimulation, tracer, injection, geophysics, microseismic, FORGE reports, site operations, resource development, technology developmentDOE Project Details
Project Name Utah FORGE
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0007080