"Womp Womp! Your browser does not support canvas :'("

Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting

Publicly accessible License 

BSC TO5 Task 2.5 Field Testing of an Un-vented Roof with Fibrous Insulation and Tiles - Winter Park, FL 32789
Field test data available for wood moisture contents, temperature, and relative humidity.

Un-vented roofs (aka cathedral-ized attics) are an established presence in Florida residential building markets. These roofs are built with a layer of spray polyurethane foam (SPF) on the underside of the roof deck. Such a roof configuration positions the heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning equipment and ductwork within the conditioned space and improves airtight-ness in practice (by shifting the air barrier from the ceiling to the roofline). However, SPF is more expensive than fibrous insulation. Some builders have also become wary of using SPF because of liability concerns about indoor air quality and off-gassing. Unfortunately, un-vented roofs that use only air-permeable fibrous insulation (cellulose or fiberglass) have been demonstrated to be at risk of moisture issues in climate zone 2A because condensation and moisture accumulation occur at the ridge.

This report describes research about a test implementation of an un-vented tile roof assembly in a hot-humid climate (Orlando, Florida; climate zone 2A); the roof was insulated with air-permeable insulation (netted and blown fiberglass). Given the localized moisture accumulation and failures seen in previous work, the U.S. Department of Energy's Building America research team Building Science Corporation theorized that installation of diffusion vents might allow for the wintertime release of moisture to safe levels. Diffusion vents are open slots at the roof's highest points (the ridge and hips) that are covered with a water-resistant but vapor-open (500+ perm) air barrier membrane.

The test home is a two-story slab-on-grade structure (3,600 ft2 ); the roof was insulated with a prototype insulation system (called boxed netting), which allows full depth insulation (i.e., it is not limited by the depth of the truss top chord). As a control comparison, one part of the roof was constructed as a typical un-vented roof (with a self-adhered membrane at the ridge). Ideally, failure would occur in the control roof and the experimental (diffusion vent) roofs would show sufficient drying to avoid failure. No intentional space conditioning was provided in the un-vented attic so worst-case humidity buildup conditions could be observed.

Citation Formats

Building Science Corporation. (2016). Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.25984/2204220.
Export Citation to RIS
Ueno, Kohta, Lstiburek, Joseph. Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting. United States: N.p., 27 Apr, 2016. Web. doi: 10.25984/2204220.
Ueno, Kohta, Lstiburek, Joseph. Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting. United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.25984/2204220
Ueno, Kohta, Lstiburek, Joseph. 2016. "Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.25984/2204220. https://data.openei.org/submissions/5508.
@div{oedi_5508, title = {Field Testing of an Unvented Roof with Fibrous Insulation, Tiles, and Vapor Diffusion Venting}, author = {Ueno, Kohta, Lstiburek, Joseph.}, abstractNote = {BSC TO5 Task 2.5 Field Testing of an Un-vented Roof with Fibrous Insulation and Tiles - Winter Park, FL 32789
Field test data available for wood moisture contents, temperature, and relative humidity.

Un-vented roofs (aka cathedral-ized attics) are an established presence in Florida residential building markets. These roofs are built with a layer of spray polyurethane foam (SPF) on the underside of the roof deck. Such a roof configuration positions the heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning equipment and ductwork within the conditioned space and improves airtight-ness in practice (by shifting the air barrier from the ceiling to the roofline). However, SPF is more expensive than fibrous insulation. Some builders have also become wary of using SPF because of liability concerns about indoor air quality and off-gassing. Unfortunately, un-vented roofs that use only air-permeable fibrous insulation (cellulose or fiberglass) have been demonstrated to be at risk of moisture issues in climate zone 2A because condensation and moisture accumulation occur at the ridge.

This report describes research about a test implementation of an un-vented tile roof assembly in a hot-humid climate (Orlando, Florida; climate zone 2A); the roof was insulated with air-permeable insulation (netted and blown fiberglass). Given the localized moisture accumulation and failures seen in previous work, the U.S. Department of Energy's Building America research team Building Science Corporation theorized that installation of diffusion vents might allow for the wintertime release of moisture to safe levels. Diffusion vents are open slots at the roof's highest points (the ridge and hips) that are covered with a water-resistant but vapor-open (500+ perm) air barrier membrane.

The test home is a two-story slab-on-grade structure (3,600 ft2 ); the roof was insulated with a prototype insulation system (called boxed netting), which allows full depth insulation (i.e., it is not limited by the depth of the truss top chord). As a control comparison, one part of the roof was constructed as a typical un-vented roof (with a self-adhered membrane at the ridge). Ideally, failure would occur in the control roof and the experimental (diffusion vent) roofs would show sufficient drying to avoid failure. No intentional space conditioning was provided in the un-vented attic so worst-case humidity buildup conditions could be observed.}, doi = {10.25984/2204220}, url = {https://data.openei.org/submissions/5508}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2016}, month = {04}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.25984/2204220

Details

Data from Apr 27, 2016

Last updated Nov 1, 2023

Submitted Apr 27, 2016

Organization

Building Science Corporation

Contact

Kohta Ueno

Authors

Kohta Ueno

Building Science Corporation

Joseph Lstiburek

Building Science Corporation

DOE Project Details

Project Name Building America

Project Number FY15 AOP 1.9.1.19

Share

Submission Downloads