Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter
Input data and heave results (unsteady RANS-VOF overset simulations performed in Star-CCM+) for a float with an ellipsoid geometry. Five extreme sea states were considered, as detailed in the conference paper "Application of the Most Likely Extreme Response Method for Wave Energy Converters" by Quon et al. (see resource below). These sea states were extrapolated from conditions near Humboldt Bay, California. Focused waves were generated using the MLER module of the Wave Design Response Toolbox (WDRT) and specified at the inlet boundary conditions. The device was constrained to heave only and a PTO was not modeled.
Citation Formats
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2016). Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.15473/1460411.
Quon, Eliot. Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter. United States: N.p., 17 Jun, 2016. Web. doi: 10.15473/1460411.
Quon, Eliot. Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter. United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15473/1460411
Quon, Eliot. 2016. "Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15473/1460411. https://mhkdr.openei.org/submissions/145.
@div{oedi_3945, title = {Most Likely Extreme Response Analysis of an Ellipsoid Float Wave Energy Converter}, author = {Quon, Eliot.}, abstractNote = {Input data and heave results (unsteady RANS-VOF overset simulations performed in Star-CCM+) for a float with an ellipsoid geometry. Five extreme sea states were considered, as detailed in the conference paper "Application of the Most Likely Extreme Response Method for Wave Energy Converters" by Quon et al. (see resource below). These sea states were extrapolated from conditions near Humboldt Bay, California. Focused waves were generated using the MLER module of the Wave Design Response Toolbox (WDRT) and specified at the inlet boundary conditions. The device was constrained to heave only and a PTO was not modeled. }, doi = {10.15473/1460411}, url = {https://mhkdr.openei.org/submissions/145}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2016}, month = {06}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15473/1460411
Details
Data from Jun 17, 2016
Last updated Jul 20, 2020
Submitted Sep 22, 2016
Organization
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Contact
Eliot Quon
Authors
Original Source
https://mhkdr.openei.org/submissions/145Research Areas
Keywords
MHK, Marine, Hydrokinetic, energy, power, wave, converter, WEC, sea, Humboldt Bay, California, CA, MLER, module, WDRT, design, response, toolbox, inlet, boundary, conditions, ellipsoid, float, extreme, computationlal fluid dynamics, CFD, numerical, modeling, analysis, most, likely, point, absorber, spectral, amplitude, operators, RAOs, point absorber buoyDOE Project Details
Project Name Wave Energy Converter Modeling
Project Lead Alison LaBonte
Project Number FY16 AOP 2111401
