EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic
As part of the geophysical characterization suite for the first EGS Collab tesbed, here are the baseline cross-well seismic data and resultant models. The campaign seismic data have been organized, concatenated with geometry and compressional (P-) & and shear (S-) wave picks, and submitted as SGY files. P-wave data were collected and analyzed in both 2D and 3D, while S-wave data were collected and analyzed in 2D only. Inversion models are provided as point volumes; the volumes have been culled to include only the points within source/receiver array coverage. The full models space volumes are also included, if relevant. An AGU 2018 poster by Linneman et al. is included that provides visualizations/descriptions of the cross-well seismic characterization method, elastic moduli calculations, and images of model inversion results.
Citation Formats
Sandia National Laboratories. (2018). EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic [data set]. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1497682.
Schwering, Paul, Condon, Kate, Knox, Hunter Anne, Linneman, Dorothy, and Hoots, Charles R. EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic. United States: N.p., 30 Apr, 2018. Web. doi: 10.15121/1497682.
Schwering, Paul, Condon, Kate, Knox, Hunter Anne, Linneman, Dorothy, & Hoots, Charles R. EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic. United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1497682
Schwering, Paul, Condon, Kate, Knox, Hunter Anne, Linneman, Dorothy, and Hoots, Charles R. 2018. "EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic". United States. https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1497682. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1121.
@div{oedi_3778, title = {EGS Collab Experiment 1: Baseline Cross-well Seismic}, author = {Schwering, Paul, Condon, Kate, Knox, Hunter Anne, Linneman, Dorothy, and Hoots, Charles R.}, abstractNote = {As part of the geophysical characterization suite for the first EGS Collab tesbed, here are the baseline cross-well seismic data and resultant models. The campaign seismic data have been organized, concatenated with geometry and compressional (P-) & and shear (S-) wave picks, and submitted as SGY files. P-wave data were collected and analyzed in both 2D and 3D, while S-wave data were collected and analyzed in 2D only. Inversion models are provided as point volumes; the volumes have been culled to include only the points within source/receiver array coverage. The full models space volumes are also included, if relevant. An AGU 2018 poster by Linneman et al. is included that provides visualizations/descriptions of the cross-well seismic characterization method, elastic moduli calculations, and images of model inversion results.}, doi = {10.15121/1497682}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1121}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2018}, month = {04}}
https://dx.doi.org/10.15121/1497682
Details
Data from Apr 30, 2018
Last updated Oct 19, 2023
Submitted Feb 20, 2019
Organization
Sandia National Laboratories
Contact
Paul Schwering
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1121Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, energy, geophysics, seismic, cross-well, sgy, SEGY, model, data, results, velocity, p-wave, s-wave, elastic moduli, visualization, calculation, inversion, hydrofracture, experiment, SURF, Sanford Underground Research Facility, EGS, enhanced geothermal system, collab, borehole, baseline, density, shear, bulk, Youngs, modulus, moduli, stimulation, hydraulic, EGS CollabDOE Project Details
Project Name EGS Collab
Project Lead Lauren Boyd
Project Number EE0032708