Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process
The current uncertainty in the global supply of rare earth elements (REEs) necessitates the development of novel extraction technologies that utilize a variety of REE source materials. Herein, we examined the techno-economic performance of integrating a biosorption approach into a large-scale process for producing salable total rare earth oxides (TREOs) from various feedstocks. An airlift bioreactor is proposed to carry out a biosorption process mediated by bioengineered rare earth-adsorbing bacteria. Techno-economic assessments were compared for three distinctive categories of REE feedstocks requiring different pre-processing steps. Key parameters identified that affect profitability include REE concentration, composition of the feedstock, and costs of feedstock pretreatment and waste management. Among the 11 specific feedstocks investigated, coal ash from the Appalachian Basin was projected to be the most profitable, largely due to its high-value REE content. Its cost breakdown includes pre-processing (leaching primarily, 77.1%), biosorption (19.4%), and oxalic acid precipitation and TREO roasting (3.5%). Surprisingly, biosorption from the high-grade Bull Hill REE ore is less profitable due to high material cost and low production revenue. Overall, our results confirmed that the application of biosorption to low-grade feedstocks for REE recovery is economically viable.
Citation Formats
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (2017). Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process [data set]. Retrieved from https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996.
Jiao, Yongqin, Jin, Hongyue, Park, Dan, Gupta, Mayank, Brewer, Aaron, Ho, Lewis, Singer, Suzanne, Bourcier, William, Woods, Sam, Reed, David, Lammers, Laura, and Sutherland, John. Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process. United States: N.p., 09 Oct, 2017. Web. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996.
Jiao, Yongqin, Jin, Hongyue, Park, Dan, Gupta, Mayank, Brewer, Aaron, Ho, Lewis, Singer, Suzanne, Bourcier, William, Woods, Sam, Reed, David, Lammers, Laura, & Sutherland, John. Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process. United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996
Jiao, Yongqin, Jin, Hongyue, Park, Dan, Gupta, Mayank, Brewer, Aaron, Ho, Lewis, Singer, Suzanne, Bourcier, William, Woods, Sam, Reed, David, Lammers, Laura, and Sutherland, John. 2017. "Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process". United States. https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996.
@div{oedi_3666, title = {Techno-Economic Assessment for Integrating Biosorption into Rare Earth Recovery Process}, author = {Jiao, Yongqin, Jin, Hongyue, Park, Dan, Gupta, Mayank, Brewer, Aaron, Ho, Lewis, Singer, Suzanne, Bourcier, William, Woods, Sam, Reed, David, Lammers, Laura, and Sutherland, John.}, abstractNote = {The current uncertainty in the global supply of rare earth elements (REEs) necessitates the development of novel extraction technologies that utilize a variety of REE source materials. Herein, we examined the techno-economic performance of integrating a biosorption approach into a large-scale process for producing salable total rare earth oxides (TREOs) from various feedstocks. An airlift bioreactor is proposed to carry out a biosorption process mediated by bioengineered rare earth-adsorbing bacteria. Techno-economic assessments were compared for three distinctive categories of REE feedstocks requiring different pre-processing steps. Key parameters identified that affect profitability include REE concentration, composition of the feedstock, and costs of feedstock pretreatment and waste management. Among the 11 specific feedstocks investigated, coal ash from the Appalachian Basin was projected to be the most profitable, largely due to its high-value REE content. Its cost breakdown includes pre-processing (leaching primarily, 77.1%), biosorption (19.4%), and oxalic acid precipitation and TREO roasting (3.5%). Surprisingly, biosorption from the high-grade Bull Hill REE ore is less profitable due to high material cost and low production revenue. Overall, our results confirmed that the application of biosorption to low-grade feedstocks for REE recovery is economically viable.}, doi = {}, url = {https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996}, journal = {}, number = , volume = , place = {United States}, year = {2017}, month = {10}}
Details
Data from Oct 9, 2017
Last updated Jan 21, 2018
Submitted Jan 9, 2018
Organization
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Contact
Yongqin Jiao
925.422.4482
Authors
Original Source
https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/996Research Areas
Keywords
geothermal, energy, TEA, resource recovery, REE, rare earth, brine, tailingsDOE Project Details
Project Name Extraction of Rare Earth Metals from Geothermal Fluids using Bioengineered Microbes
Project Lead Holly Thomas
Project Number LLNL FY17 AOP 2.5.1.12