Search OEDI Data
Showing results 1 - 25 of 713.
Show
results per page.
Order by:
Available Now:
Research Areas
Accessibility
Data Type
Organization
Source
Cape EGS: Frisco Pad Wells Flow Test Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco pad flow test project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between July 17th Aug 12th 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed Acoustic...
Dadi, S. and Kanu, O. Fervo Energy
Nov 06, 2024
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Drilling Data and Logs
This dataset consists of drilling data (Pason data spreadsheets, daily reports, days v. depth, mud logs), Schlumberger logs (FMI, shear anisotropy analysis, memory, sonic, array induction/spectral density/dual spaced neutron/gamma ray/caliper, spectral GR/temperature, and Gardner ...
Bristol, J. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 19, 2021
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Cape EGS: Frisco 2-P Well Stimulation Microseismic Data
This dataset contains microseismic data acquired during the Frisco 2-P well stimulation project led by Fervo Energy, conducted between June 1 and June 11, 2024, near the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The microseismic data was collected from various Utah FORGE wells: via Distributed ...
Dadi, S. and Titov, A. Fervo Energy
Sep 19, 2024
26 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
26 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Wells Updated Temperature and Pressure Logs (June 2021)
This dataset includes updated temperature and pressure logs for Utah FORGE wells 56-32, 78-32, and 58-32. This data was acquired in June 2021.
Stout, F. Di Drill Survey Services
Jun 29, 2021
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 56-32 Sludge XRF
This is an Excel spreadsheet containing the results of X-ray fluorescence from well 56-32 sludge samples. The instrumentation used was a Olympus Vanta M series handheld XRF analyzer. A glass (SiO2) "blank" was analyzed at the beginning and end of each sample batch to detect contam...
Smith, K. Utah Geological Survey
Jul 15, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates
Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injecti...
Hardwick, C. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 07, 2020
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Deep Wells Temperature Surveys as of September 2022
This Excel spreadsheet contains temperature survey results for Utah FORGE wells 58-32, 78-32, 56-32, 16A(78)-32 and 78B-32. It also contains charts and comparisons, along with a "Data Summary" which provides links to previous GDR submissions with temperature data for each well.
Jones, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Sep 16, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Updated Well, Well Pad, and Seismic Station GPS Coordinates December, 2021
This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 78B-32, 56-32, 58-32, 68-32, and 16A(78)-32 and seismic stations BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR1, FOR2, FOR5, FOR6, FOR 7, FOR8, FORK, FORU, FORW, and FORB. These are from a GPS ...
Erickson, B. Utah Geological Survey
Dec 13, 2021
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Deep Wells Water and Gas Sampling with Analyses by ThermoChem (October, 2022)
This data includes a document that describes the effort to collect and analyze water and gas samples from deep Utah FORGE wells 16A(78)-32, 58-32, 56-32 and 78B-32 along with additional pdf files showing ThermoChem's analyses attached as an appendix.
Joness, C. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Oct 26, 2022
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Borehole PSS Tools Status Report
This report summarizes the data quality from the Utah FORGE borehole passive seismic sensors (PSS) tools at well sites 58-32 and 78B-32. Two level Avalon tools were installed on 09-28-2022 and 09-29-2022 by representatives from Avalon, Schlumberger, University of Utah, and Instrum...
Stachnik, J. Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc.
Dec 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: GES Well 16A(78)-32 and Well 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Seismic Event Catalogs
This dataset contains seismic event catalogs from the hydraulic stimulation of wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 at the Utah FORGE site in April 2024. The data was collected by Geo Energy Suisse (GES) using a variety of seismic monitoring technologies, including 3-component (3C) geo...
Dyer, B. et al University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Apr 30, 2024
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 58-32 Stimulation Conference Paper and Data
The U.S. Department of Energy's (U.S. DOE) Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is a field laboratory that provides a unique opportunity to develop and test new technologies for characterizing, creating and sustaining Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in ...
Best, S. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 24, 2019
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE 6-3712: Report on a Data Foundation for Real-Time Identification of Microseismic Events
This submission is a technical report for the Probabilistic Estimation of Seismic Response Using Physics Informed Recurrent Neural Networks project. The report describes the process of extracting events from the borehole seismic sensors. To be effective once deployed, the process ...
Williams, J. et al Global Technology Connection, Inc.
Jan 21, 2025
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
3 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Fort Bliss Geothermal Area Data: Temperature Profile, Logs, Schematic Model and Cross Section
This dataset contains a variety of data about the Fort Bliss geothermal area, part of the southern portion of the Tularosa Basin, New Mexico. The dataset contains schematic models for the McGregor Geothermal System, a shallow temperature survey of the Fort Bliss geothermal area. ...
Brandt, A. University of Utah
Nov 15, 2015
14 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
14 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Native State Model 2022 Update
This is the Phase 3 native state model update. The Phase 3 numerical model represents a significant subsurface volume below the FORGE site footprint. The model domain of 4.0 km x 4.0 km x 4.2 km is located approximately between depths of 4000 to 4200 meters below land surface. Thi...
Podgorney, R. and Liu, R. Idaho National Laboratory
Jul 29, 2022
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
1 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Brady's Geothermal Field Distributed Temperature Sensing Data
This submission is an 8 day time history of vertical temperature measurements in Brady observation well 56-1 collected during the PoroTomo field experiment. The data was collected with a fiber-optic DTS system installed to a depth of 372 m below wellhead. DTS installation uses a d...
Patterson, J. University of Wisconsin
Mar 26, 2016
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
2 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
WISE-CASING: Surface Seismic Survey at Cymric Field, California Central Valley
This test was conducted at the Chevron Cymric oilfield in the California central valley near Bakersfield. A reflected seismic signal was observed in all three components (x, y, z) of the 3-component Episensor geophone, as well as all phones on the single component array. The arriv...
Wu, Y. et al Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Apr 02, 2018
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
PoroTomo Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) Measurements made in Brady Observation Well 56-1
This submission is a follow-up to Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) measurements made in Brady observation well 56-1 during the PoroTomo field experiment conducted in March, 2016. The measurements in this data set were made on August 24, 2018 over an approximately 20 hour per...
Kratt, C. et al Oregon State University
Jan 09, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Brady Hot Springs Seismic Modeling Data for Push-Pull Project
This submission includes synthetic seismic modeling data for the Push-Pull project at Brady Hot Springs, NV. The synthetic seismic is all generated by finite-difference method regarding different fracture and rock properties.
Zhang, R. University of Louisiana
Jul 31, 2018
56 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
56 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Brady's Geothermal Field Metadata for DTS and DAS Surveys
Metadata for DTS and DAS datasets for both borehole 56-1 and trenched cables.
Coleman, T. University of Wisconsin
Mar 26, 2016
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
5 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Snake River Plain Geothermal Play Fairway Analysis Project Active Source Seismic Data
This archive contains seismic shot field records for 10 profiles located in Camas Prairie, Idaho. The eight numbered .sgy files were acquired using a seismic land streamer system with an accelerated weight drop source and 72 geophones. These 10-Hz geophones were mounted on base pl...
Liberty, L. and Shervais, J. Boise State University
Sep 30, 2018
21 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
21 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations
This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area:
An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 an...
Abraham, S. et al Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Mar 26, 2019
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
6 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Logs and Data from Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1)
Data, logs, and graphics associated with the drilling and testing of Utah FORGE deep test well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) near Roosevelt Hot Springs.
Nash, G. and Moore, J. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 11, 2018
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
11 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Phase 3 Gearbox 3 Test
The GRC uses a combined gearbox testing, modeling, and analysis approach disseminating data and results to the industry and facilitating improvement of gearbox reliability. This test data describes the tests of GRC gearbox 3 in the National Wind Technology Center dynamometer and d...
Keller and WallenNational Renewable Energy Laboratory
Dec 21, 2016
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
18 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 Stimulation Production Logging Tests
These are production logging tests (PLT) results from Halliburton collected during the nine hour circulation test performed at Utah FORGE on April 27th, 2024. The circulation test involved injecting into well 16A(78)-32 and producing out of well 16B(78)-32) and was carried out af...
Haroun, F. Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
Apr 27, 2024
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible
4 Resources
0 Stars
Publicly accessible